IRS help for pet owners is sorely lacking right now.

Don’t even think, for example, that you can claim your dog as a dependent on your 1040 tax form for 2010. You cannot simply “write off your dog” come time to file taxes. According to the Turbo Tax Support Blog, “Although the IRS doesn’t specifically spell it out, it is tacitly implied that dependents — at least for taxation purposes — must be human.”

H&R Block, meanwhile, reports that the IRS said no way some years ago when a taxpayer tried to write off the boarding costs of his dog as a travel expense when he went away on a business trip. H&R Block called this boneheaded move one of the “most unusual tax deductions ever.” Pull a stunt like this, and you’ll want to find a good tax attorney.

But while claiming your dog or cat as a dependent or travel expense (and reaping the windfall from a tax refund) is a five-alarm no-no with the auditors over at the IRS, there’s some small glimmer of hope yet that pet owners can see some form of tax relief. That’s because a U.S. representative from Michigan introduced a bill known as the HAPPY Act.

The legislation would grant individual taxpayers a $3,500 tax deduction per year (not per pet) for “qualified pet care expenses,” including veterinary costs and other day-to-day costs of raising a pet. Pets that qualify for the tax break would include not only dogs and cats but all sorts of furry and non-furry critters, from horses to fish and turtles, to birds, rabbits and hamsters.

The bill (which NPR boasted as a possible “four-figure tax break for our four-legged friends”) was introduced during the summer of 2009, but as of November 2010 it has gone nowhere. So don’t get your hopes up too much. In fact, while the legislator who introduced the legislation was re-elected, his top priority is “jobs, jobs, jobs,” and he mentioned nothing about the HAPPY Act.

Obviously a pets tax deduction like the one imagined by the HAPPY legislation would be welcome IRS help for pet owners. After all, Americans spend a reported $45 billion annually on their pets. And discovering a new tax write-off such as this would encourage pet ownership, not to mention help decrease animal shelter populations across the country.

So… would this mean your dog will soon have to get a Social Security number? Let’s hope not. But any kind of IRS help is always welcome, right?

Income tax help 2011Recommended

Now it’s easier to get the biggest tax refund possible — the legal route. The TurboTax Deluxe software gives step by step instructions to maximize your refund. Its “audit risk meter” helps lower your risk for an audit. File both federal and state income taxes. This is a very hot seller… (Find out more.)

Top photo: Dave Head/Flickr

Related Article: Cat Lady Convinces IRS that Rescue Expenses Are Deductible

email
 
 

Tags

 
DISCLAIMER: Pets Adviser contains personal opinions and is not intended to diagnose, treat or give medical guidance. Consult a veterinarian, particularly in an emergency. [More Info]
  • Jonathan

    I think it is about time the tax authorities move to make some expenses allowable. After all, the pet market as you rightly point out is huge (although for most of us we own pets for the love of it, not as a purely business interest).

  • Linda Depriter

    Yes, we need help with our pets. If we can declare gambling losses, why can’t we declare medical costs for our pets? They are like our kids and have that right. They have animal police now, thank god, and that shows they are important and should be allowed on taxes.

    • David Deleon Baker

      Hi Linda, thanks for stopping by. Yes, I agree — we should be able to take some deduction at the very least for pets healthcare costs (which have grown way out of control). You make an excellent point that if gambling losses can be claimed, why not the exorbitant costs of raising a dog or cat? The Happy Act, as originally written (and I think we can write it off for good), gave a deduction that was almost equal to the child deduction… not sure that’s equivalent, but I do feel that some nod to pets is due.

  • Linda Depriter

    Thanks David, one day soon I’m hoping with all my heart this will happen so all pets can have vet help…

  • Lynne

    I agree with Linda. If gamblers can claim gambling losses, which is ridiculous, and our furkids need us — they depend on us to provide for them — then I say this is a great idea.

    After all, if I have to pay taxes for things that do not benefit me or pay for welfare, then I should get a tax break for being a responsible pawrent.

    I worked my way through school and have student loans. Having my dog and cat was all I had at times, so they have made life easier to deal with at times. Besides, it would be beneficial to keep animals out of the shelters and help owners. Also, it benefits the vet offices in this economy since the owners know they will recoup some expenses. And it will benefit jobs dealing with the pet industry. Hey, kids can walk to school, like I did, or let their parents drive them.

    • David Deleon Baker

      “Responsible pawrent” — I like that, Lynne!

      You’re right, a tax benefit like this would be a boost to veterinary offices, not to mention improve health outcomes for pets (owners won’t be so hesitant to put their hard-earned money toward needed medications or surgeries if they will be getting some of that money back later).

      • Lynne

        Oh thank you, I like it too. Pawrent, that’s it.

        I have friends who are DVMs in other states and even my vet here says the economy has taken a bite out of their normal appointment schedule. It seems even routine exams and shots and spay/neuter are down. It is the animal that suffers.

        Many shelters across the U.S. are funded by donations, not taxes. They have volunteers, like me, or rescue groups that take in fosters, which I have done as well. Someone has to do it, and it would be great if we “responsible pawrents” had some “thank you” benefit.